I did a crazy thing this month. I sent out a short survey to a number of clients and ex-clients asking for brutal honesty.
And I got it.
I deliberately targeted a few who had fired me. Most people were very complimentary. But a small number mentioned the same issue that bugged them. I was unaware of this issue and will now do everything to fix it.
This made me wonder how huge brands, particularly services, could benefit by asking, “What one thing could we do better?” Imagine what a Bank could learn if it asked this simple question. And imagine how its brand image would be improved just by the act of asking.
If this becomes a marketing fad of the future, remember you heard it here first.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Crazy or what?
Posted by
Tony Richardson
at
1.4.09
0
comments
Labels: advertising, bank, brands, marketing, marketing communications, Tony Richardson
Thursday, February 26, 2009
My dinner with Juliette

I had dinner with French actress Juliette Binoche last night. She made some very interesting remarks on creativity.
(OK … I was the guest of a TV exec. friend, at a fund-raising dinner where Ms Binoche spoke and dined. We never actually conversed.)
Best known as an Academy Award-winning actor, Juliette Binoche, has taught herself to dance and is travelling the world with dancer Akram Khan doing a very physical and emotional performance.
In an after show interview Binoche talked about risk. She said that all creativity requires risk, otherwise you just stood still.
As an actor she could easily have made a complete fool of herself attempting to dance. But she didn’t. The performance was extraordinary. The risk paid off.
This reminded me that in marketing communications we too need to take risks in order to reap greater rewards. A risk in our industry could be as simple as not copying what the competition are doing – I’ve mentioned before how most automotive ads look the same.
Another risk might be to commission original music rather than buying an existing track. Maybe next time you are judging a piece of creative work, it would be worth asking, where is the risk? Could it work better with a little more risk taking? Will a small risk give me the jump on my competition?
Here’s an example of a risk that I believe pays off big time. And it’s for an automotive brand!
The agency and marketing department of Skoda Cars could have taken the no-risk approach and just said ‘quality for less’ like all their competitors. They would have been on brief. And most consumers would have forgotten them instantly.
Instead they took a risk and cast a clown! I repeat ‘a clown’. Personally, I’ll never forget this ad … ever. How many of us can say that our last ad will stay with consumers for life?
Posted by
Tony Richardson
at
26.2.09
0
comments
Labels: advertising, marketing communications, risk, Tony Richardson, tv advertisng
Saturday, January 3, 2009
Are you paying too much for creative work?

Strong creative communications and advertising ideas are immensely valuable marketing tools. But what are they worth? How do you know that you are paying a fair price for something as ephemeral as an idea?
Let’s go to my kitchen to find out.
My kitchen mixer (or tap or faucet) had died and begun to leak all over the place. So I bought a new mixer and started the job of removing the old one. It soon became clear that the old mixer was held in by a single rusted bolt that didn’t want to budge. The job was a bit beyond me so I called a plumbing company.
He arrived, took a quick look and flipped open the price book. My eyes nearly fell out of their sockets when I saw the figure of $508. This is to install a kitchen mixer that I had already bought, mind you. The guy was an employee and the price was not negotiable.
I politely said, ‘No thanks, I’ll get a friend to help me get it sorted somehow.’
The plumber then offered to do the job for the company hourly rate: the hourly rate being $250. You may not be too surprised to hear that this was still too rich for my blood.
As I thanked him and showed him the door, the plumber then offered to do the job for $100 cash. Now he was talking sense! ‘You bet’, I replied. $100 is about what I had expected before he came.
The new mixer was installed in 10 minutes.
How does this relate to creative pricing?
Here’s how. Each of the prices quoted to me came with a bundle of advantages.
- The original $508 was fixed and known. This is very similar to paying a communications agency a monthly retainer. The costs are high but you know where you stand upfront. This method is good if you haven’t got a clue about what’s involved in the job.
- The hourly rate of $250 was half the fixed price. The risk I took was that the job would drag on. This is the same risk a marketer takes when they pay an agency by the hour. Where does it end? Is there any benefit in the supplier working quickly?
- The final figure of $100 was what I had in mind from the start. In the same way a marketer who states a price as part of their brief seldom gets cost blowouts.
But the really important parallel between my kitchen and your marketing communications is this:
The very same job can cost you up to 500% more!
- It will cost you more if you are unaware of the process. Acquaint yourself with the costs of similar jobs done in the past.
- It will cost you more if you want all the bells and whistles. Agencies with nice furniture, water views, free lunches, lots of staff: who pays for all this stuff? You.
- It will cost you more if you don’t set a realistic budget as part of the brief. Good creative suppliers will work to your stated budget.
So by following the tips above, you’ll get what you want for the cost you want.
Now, I’m going to have a chat to my kids about a future career in plumbing.
Posted by
Tony Richardson
at
3.1.09
4
comments
Labels: advertising, advertising costs, advertising price, cost of advertising, creative costs, marketing communications, marketing cost, Tony Richardson


